Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1519

reference
365-tree-1
name
1519
tree-preservation-order

undefined

365-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.018968 50.893371)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.018911 50.893365,-1.018914 50.893376,-1.018922 50.893387,-1.018934 50.893395,-1.018950 50.893400,-1.018967 50.893402,-1.018985 50.893400,-1.019001 50.893395,-1.019014 50.893387,-1.019022 50.893377,-1.019025 50.893366,-1.019022 50.893355,-1.019015 50.893345,-1.019002 50.893337,-1.018986 50.893332,-1.018969 50.893330,-1.018951 50.893331,-1.018935 50.893336,-1.018923 50.893344,-1.018914 50.893354,-1.018911 50.893365)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL